In his Worlds in Collision (New York: Macmillan, 1950), Immanuel Velikovsky argued that Venus emerged as a red-hot comet from Jupiter and passed Earth every 52 years, causing the Bronze Age catastrophes, before settling into its current orbit. His claim set off a controversy in which his theory was rejected and stigmatized. But over the years, new findings have changed the picture. Here are eight new reasons to accept a Revised Venus Theory.
In his Worlds in Collision (1950), pioneer scientist Immanuel Velikovsky put forward a theory that Earth had inverted during the Bronze Age Catastrophes; but many scientists considered his proposed electromagnetic cause unpersuasive. In 1982 British physicist Peter Warlow, otherwise a Velikovsky supporter, presented a gravitational explanation. Here Stephen J. Dillon and Kenneth J. Dillon of Scientia Press discuss Warlow’s The Reversing Earth (1982) and its role in the debate over Velikovsky’s theories and findings. See also https://www.scientiapress.com/theory-of-the-reversing-earth.